Inferra AI / Company / TGB / Slides
Taseko Mines — October 2026 Corporate Presentation Download (company IR deck)
Taseko Mines (TGB) · 42 slides · Filed Oct 29, 2026
Every slide of this earnings presentation, with the text as published. Open the original deck ↗ · All TGB deck slides
Slide 1 — North
A Leading, Low-Cost North-American Copper Producer October 2026
Slide 2 — Disclaimer
Disclaimer This presentation contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Legislation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act and 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which may not be based on historical fact, including without limitation, statements regarding our expectations in respect to future financial position, business strategy, future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities, events or developments that we expect to take place in the future, projected costs and plans and objectives. All information contained in this presentation, other than statements of current and historical fact, is forward-looking information. Often, but not always, forward- looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “estimate,” “scheduled,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects,” “aim” and similar expressions. All of the forward-looking information in this presentation is qualified by this cautionary note. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical facts, that address estimated mineral resource and reserve quantities, grades and contained metal, and possible future mining, exploration and development activities, are forward-looking statements. Although Trekor Metals Limited (“Trekor”) believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements should not be in any way construed as guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward- looking statements include market prices for metals, the conclusions of detailed feasibility and technical analyses, lower than expected grades and quantities of resources, mining rates and recovery rates and the lack of availability of necessary capital, which may not be available to Trekor on terms acceptable to it or at all. Trekor is subject to the specific risks inherent in the mining business as well as general economic and business conditions. For more information on Trekor, investors should review Trekor’s annual Form 40-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and its Canadian securities filings that are available at www.sedarplus.ca. This presentation contains unaudited “non-IFRS” financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA and net debt. The non-IFRS financial measures contained in this presentation are not measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) or international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”) and should not be considered as replacements or alternatives to net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity. Non-IFRS measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as substitute for, analysis of Trekor’s results reported in accordance with IFRS or otherwise. Notwithstanding these limitations, and in conjunction with other accounting and financial information available, Trekor’s management considers the non-IFRS financial measurers contained in this presentation to be reasonable indicators for comparisons between Trekor and Trekor’s principal competitors in the market. These non-IFRS measures are used by market participants for comparative analysis, albeit with certain limitations, of the results of businesses in the sector and as indicators of Trekor’s capacity to generate cash flow. Nevertheless, non-IFRS financial measures do not have any standardized meaning and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. 2
Slide 3 — Trekor – Investment Highlights
Gibraltar Mine Florence Copper Yellowhead Project Aly Niobium New Prosperity Strong Financial Profile Disciplined balance sheet management with financial strength to fund strategy. Trekor – Investment Highlights 3 A Leading North American Copper Producer YELLOWHEAD ALEY Proven Team of Mine Builders & Operators Experienced leaders with a track record of building and operating successful mining assets. Focused in North America All assets located in stable jurisdictions with access to skilled people, infrastructure and key markets. Growing Copper Producer Two operating mines delivering strong results today. GIBRALTAR FLORENCE COPPER Future growth pipeline Advanced projects with district-scale potential for long-term growth. Commitment To Responsible Development Safe operations, responsible practices and meaningful community partnerships. Trekor Highlights
Slide 4 — Trekor – Operations and Projects
Trekor – Operations and Projects 4 North American Asset Base Commodity: Copper, Molybdenum LOM Avg. Annual Production: 130 M lbs copper 2.3 M lbs Molybdenum OPERATING DEVELOPMENT Gibraltar Mine Cariboo-Chilcotin, BC 01 Yellowhead Project Thompson-Nicola, BC 03 Focused in North America British Columbia | Arizona Yellowhead Project Florence Copper New Prosperity Gibraltar Mine ADVANCED STAGE PROJECT New Prosperity Cariboo-Chilcotin, BC 05 Commodity: Copper (w/ Gold and Silver) LOM Avg. Annual Production: 178 M lbs copper Commodity: Copper, Gold LOM Avg. Annual Production: +400,000 gold equivalent ounces DEVELOPMENT OPERATING Florence Copper Florence, AZ 02 Aley Project Mackenzie, BC 04 Commodity: Copper Annual Production Capacity: 85 M lbs copper Commodity: Niobium Annual Production Capacity: 9 M kgs niobium Aley Project
Slide 5 — Copper Price Outlook
Copper Price Outlook Structural Demand Trends Electrification boom: electric vehicles, renewable energy, and grid upgrades require large amounts of copper Data center expansion: AI and cloud computing are increasing power infrastructure demand Growing urbanization: Asian markets construction and infrastructure needs Supply Constraints • Limited new mine development: years of under-investment means fewer new projects coming online • Declining ore grades: existing mines are producing lower-quality ore, increasing costs • Operational disruptions: permitting delays, labor issues, water constraints, and political instability in major producing countries (Chile, Peru) Investor Interest Copper increasingly viewed as a long-term energy transition asset Commodity cycles: after pandemic-era surpluses cleared, inventories are now relatively low Recent copper price strength driven by: 5 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 LME Copper Price (US$/lb) Average: $2.44 Average: $4.28
Slide 6 — Copper Price Outlook
Copper Price Outlook 6 Note: S&P Global (1) Includes copper demand from construction, cooling, appliances, fossil power generation, machinery and ICE vehicles. 2. Includes copper demand from clean technologies, T&D and EVs. Highlights from S&P Global Copper Study (January 2026) Primary global copper production is forecast to rise from 23 million metric tons (MMT) in 2025 to a peak of 27 MMT in 2030, before falling to 22 MMT by 2040 Global demand for copper will increase by 50% over current levels by 2040 to 42 MMT Without significant new mine production and/or expansion of existing mines, S&P Global forecasts an unprecedented copper supply deficit of 10 MMT by 2040 Supply Constraints • Average copper mine takes 17 years from discovery to production, with much time spent on permitting, environmental reviews, and community consultations • Inflation, lower ore grades, and deeper and more remote mining increase costs, raising the copper price needed to incentivize new supply Net change in global copper demand vector (2025 vs 2040) Change in demand by sector (millions, metric tonnes)
Slide 7 — $331M
$331M REVENUE Recent Results – Q2 2026 7 Operational momentum • 36M lbs consolidated copper production • Gibraltar produced 30M lbs of copper • Florence Copper produced 5 million pounds in its first full quarter of operations • Consolidated sales of 38 million pounds • Gibraltar C1 operating cost: US$2.41/lb • Cash balance: $186 million; total available liquidity: $342 million • 2026 production guidance maintained: 110–115M lbs Gibraltar + 30–35M lbs Florence $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 Q1 2026 Q2 2026 C$, millions Adj. EBITDA Cash Flow from Operations Record Quarter Driven by Strong Copper Prices & Production $125M ADJUSTED EBITDA $183M OPERATING CASH FLOW $41M $0.11/share ADJ. NET INCOME KEY TAKEAWAY Trekor entered Q2 as a stronger, multi-asset copper producer with further upside as Florence Copper ramps toward full production.
Slide 8 — A foundation of stable cashflow
Gibraltar Copper Mine – British Columbia A foundation of stable cashflow MINE TYPE Open Pit – Cu/Mo STAGE Producing ANNUAL PRODUCTION 130Mlbs (~60kt Cu) CASH COSTS (LOM) US$2.30/lb MINE LIFE 19 Years REPLACEMENT VALUE +US$1 billion1 1. Calculated using US$15,000 / ton capacity multiplied by capacity of 85,000 tons. 8
Slide 9 — Gibraltar is the 2nd largest
Gibraltar Copper Mine – Large-Scale, Steady-State Mine 9 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Gibraltar Copper Production Statistics Modernization & Expansion Period Post Expansion Value Creation Source: Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine, March 2022. (1) Gibraltar NPV using an 8% discount rate and long-term copper price of US$5.50/lb *2026 production guidance was revised upwards to 115 to 120 million pounds (up from 110 to 115 million, inclusive of cathode. Gibraltar is the 2nd largest copper mine in Canada 1999 Acquired for $1 2004 Restarted operations 2006 to 2013 Invested ~C$800 million to expand and modernize the mine to 85,000 tons per day 2014 to current Operating steady-state at expanded capacity 2023 and 2024 Purchased 25% of mine from JV partners, increasing ownership to 100% NPV8 after-tax estimated at C$3.4 billion1 Industry leader in Health & Safety, Environmental and Indigenous Relations *
Slide 10 — Gibraltar Mine – Cash Flow Growth from Stable Mining Operation
Gibraltar Mine – Cash Flow Growth from Stable Mining Operation 10 Foundation of stable cash flow for Trekor throughout the copper price cycle Stringent cost management practices ensure positive operating cash flow maintained with extended periods of weak copper prices Many input costs correlated with the copper price, serving as a natural hedge • i.e. Oil, shipping rates, C$:US$ exchange rate Cash flow highly sensitive to copper price • US$0.25/lb increase in copper price equates to a ~C$45M increase in cash flow Operating Margin1 Leverage to copper has resulted in strong earnings growth and cash flow generation (1) C$, millions. Based on LoM average production of 130M lbs copper and 1.35 C$/US$ FX rate. Recent Performance Third quarter copper production totaled 34 million pounds (94 million pounds YTD) driven by grades and increasing cathode production 2026 production guidance was increased to 115-120 million pounds (from 110 to 115 million) due to strong YTD production Copper Price (US$/lb) C1 Cash Costs (US$/lb) $2.60 $2.40 $2.20 $4.50 $345 $380 $420 $5.00 $435 $475 $510 $5.50 $530 $565 $600 $6.00 $620 $655 $690 $6.50 $710 $745 $785
Slide 11 — Pathway to a low-cost future
Florence Copper – Arizona Pathway to a low-cost future 11 MINE TYPE In-situ Leach STAGE Producing PROCESSING SX/EW PRODUCTION (PER YEAR) 85Mlb (~40kt) Cu ESTIMATED CASH COSTS US$1.11/lb LOM MINE LIFE 22 Years
Slide 12 — Florence Copper – First Greenfield ISCR Operation
Florence Copper – First Greenfield ISCR Operation 12 Construction completed on time and on-budget in Q4 2025 Development Timeline 2014 Property acquisition 2018–2020 Production Test Facility (PTF) September 2023 Final permits issued by US EPA January 2024 Initiated construction of commercial production facility October 2025 Construction completed February 2026 First copper cathode produced 2026 Ramp-up to full production capacity 2026 production guidance is 25-28 million pounds
Slide 13 — Trekor will be the 3rd largest
Florence Copper – First Greenfield ISCR Operation 13 The first new copper producer in the United States in more than a decade (1) Based on the Florence 43-101 Technical Report with an effective date of March 15, 2023. Project Highlights1 Mine Life 22 years Annual production capacity 85 million pounds (~40k metric tonnes) of copper cathode After-tax NPV(8%) US$930 million @ US$3.75/lb copper After-tax IRR 47% Payback 2.6 years LOM Operating Costs (C1) of US$1.11/lb Trekor will be the 3rd largest copper cathode producer in the US At US$6.00/lb copper the after-tax NPV8 is US$2.1 billion
Slide 14 — In-Situ Copper Recovery (“ISCR”)
April 24, 2019 In-Situ Copper Recovery (“ISCR”) 14 • PTF constructed in 2018 and operated for 18 months • 24 wells in test wellfield and SX/EW plant • The PTF demonstrated successful copper production and the ability to maintain hydraulic control of fluid within the oxidized zone • Valuable data on initial leach periods, sweep efficiencies and recoveries was collected to inform future commercial scale operations • The PTF plant produced a total of 1.1 million pounds of high-grade copper cathode product from the ISCR leach solutions Production Test Facility (“PTF”) First Cathode Harvest
Slide 15 — Florence Copper – Operations / Wellfield
Florence Copper – Operations / Wellfield 15 • Commenced wellfield operations in November 2025 with ~90 production wells • First copper cathodes produced in February • Copper Cathode Production • Q1 2026: 1.5 million pounds • Q2 2026: 5.2 million pounds • Q3 2026: 7.0 million pounds • Wellfield drilling restarted in Q4 2025 – new wells to begin phasing into operation throughout 2026 • ~100 wells per year to be drilling on an ongoing basis (LOM average) 0 25 50 75 100 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 First 5 Years of Production1 (millions pounds) (1) Based on the Florence 43-101 Technical Report with an effective date of March 15, 2023.
Slide 16 — Florence Copper – Overall Performance To-Date
Florence Copper – Overall Performance To-Date 16 Solid progress on ramp up to-date. Continuous month-over-month production improvements No significant wellfield performance issues – flow rates and leaching better than modeled Work ongoing to optimize wellfield performance (balance between solution flow and PLS grades) SX/EW plant has been operating steady state at the lower flow rates Strong safety and environmental record over first nine months Production will be further boosted as acidification of new wells progresses throughout 2026 Expect to produce 25 to 28 million pounds in 2026 and reach production capacity (7M lbs/month) in early 2027
Slide 17 — Benefits of ISCR
Benefits of ISCR 17 Arizona Conventional Open-pit Mine vs. Florence Copper Project Other Benefits Low Cost Limited land disturbance Small environmental footprint (less than a square mile) Low dust emissions Numerous site redevelopment opportunities (post-closure) No downstream freight, smelting, or refinery requirements 65% 75% 78% Energy Consumption (kWh/lb Cu) Carbon Emissions (kg Co2/lb Cu) Water Use (gal/lb Cu)
Slide 18 — Florence Copper
Florence Copper 18 • Provided US$50 million of construction financing (Deal closed December 2023) • Strong endorsement of project valuation: o Initial US$50 million investment for 2.67% copper stream plus an offtake contract for 81% of the copper cathode produced during the initial years of operation o Mitsui has the option to invest an additional US$50 million (for total investment of US$100 million) to convert the stream to a 10% joint venture interest o Implies ~US$1 billion project value • Mitsui and Florence Copper to develop sales channels for ‘Made in America’ copper, leveraging Florence’s low-carbon production • 8% pre-tax cost of capital (at US$4.00/lb copper) About Mitsui: Mitsui & Co., Ltd. is a Japanese multinational conglomerate with a global presence, operating as a diversified trading, investment, and service enterprise with a presence in 62 countries and regions. Its business spans various sectors, including mineral and metal resources, machinery, chemicals, energy, and lifestyle, and it engages in activities like product sales, logistics, financing, infrastructure development, and project coordination. Import tariffs on copper cathodes to be reviewed by U.S. Government in 2026 Strategic Partnership with Mitsui $4.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5.50 $6.00 $6.50 $7.00 Jan-25 Apr-25 Jul-25 Oct-25 Jan-26 Apr-26 Jul-26 Oct-26 LME vs COMEX LME Comex Copper Cathodes Exempt from Tariffs Announcement 50% Tariff on Copper Imports Announced
Slide 19 — Looking to the Future
Trekor Metals Looking to the Future 19
Slide 20 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Advanced Staged Project
Yellowhead Copper Project – Advanced Staged Project 20 LOCATION 150 km NE of Kamloops, British Columbia MINE TYPE Open-pit MINE OWNERSHIP 100% MINE LIFE 25 Years LIFE OF MINE PRODUCTION1 4.4 billion pounds recoverable copper; 282 koz gold; 19 Moz silver (1) Based on the Technical Report Update on the Yellowhead Copper Project, British Columbia, Canada, dated July 10th, 2025 which has an effective date of June 15, 2025. Project Economics1 Initial capital cost C$2.0 billion After-tax NPV8 C$2.0 billion @ US$4.25/lb copper LOM strip ratio 1.4:1 Onsite operating cost C$12.89 per tonne milled Annual production • First 5 years: 206M lbs copper • LOM average: 178M lbs copper Total Cash Costs (C1) • First Five Years: US$1.62/lb • LOM: US$1.90/lb Before-tax free cash flow • First 5 Years: C$2.8 billion • LOM: $10.1 billion Acquired for C$16 million in 2019 - At current long-term consensus copper price of US$5.25/lb the after-tax NPV8 is $3.6 billion
Slide 21 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked
• Ranks comparably among other North and South American copper development projects • Minimal value being ascribed for Yellowhead by analysts / zero value in Trekor equity Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked 21 (1) Bubble size represents annual copper production (2) Market Capitalization used for single asset companies, analyst consensus used for Yellowhead, Santo Domingo and Copper World. (C$, billions) $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 Cactus Santa Cruz Santo Domingo Copper World Copper Creek North Island Yellowhead Market Cap / Analyst Consensus Value2 Arizona Sonoran acquired for ~C$2 billion A top tier copper project in quality jurisdiction Yellowhead (Trekor) Copper World Hudbay) Santa Cruz (Ivanhoe Electric) Santo Domingo (Capstone) North Island (Northisle) Arizona Sonoran (Cactus) Copper Creek (Faraday) 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 IRR (%) NPV (C$) Project Economics (After-tax)1
Slide 22 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked
Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked 22 Hudbay’s acquisition of Arizona Sonoran (Cactus project): • ~C$2.0 billion (~36% premium) • Highlights market appetite for de-risked, North American based copper projects • Reinforces valuation for large, long-life assets similar to Yellowhead Recent Project Acquisition P/NAV Cactus NPV8 (C$ billions) $3.1 Acquisition Value (C$ billions) $2.0 P/NAV 0.63 Yellowhead NPV (8%) $2.0 Implied Value (C$ billions) at 0.63x $1.3 Implied Value per Trekor Share (C$) $3.49 In Situ Value Cactus LOM Production (lbs billions) 4.4 Acquisition Value (C$ billions) $2.0 C$ Price per lb $0.44 Yellowhead LOM Production (lbs billions) 4.4 Implied Value (C$ billions) @ 0.44/lb $1.9 Implied Value per Trekor Share (C$) $5.36 Applying the same acquisition metrics to Yellowhead implies significant value still to be unlocked in Trekor equity
Slide 23 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked
Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked Advance environmental assessment review process which was commenced in July 2025 Recent Project Initiatives 23 New technical report (issued July 2025) Continue technical optimization and improvements Ongoing community engagement Designated a priority project by the Province of BC
Slide 24 — New Prosperity Gold-Copper Project
New Prosperity Gold-Copper Project 24 • One of the largest undeveloped Copper-Gold porphyries in the world • Life of mine average annual production of +400,000 gold equivalent ounces over a 33 year mine life (based on 2009 Technical Report*) Recent Development • Agreement signed with the Tŝilhqot'in Nation and Province of BC (June 2025) • Trekor to receive a $75 million payment from the Province of BC • Trekor will contribute a 22.5% equity interest in New Prosperity to a trust for the future benefit of the Tŝilhqot'in Nation. • Trust will transfer the property interest to the Tŝilhqot’in Nation when and if it consents to a proposal to pursue mineral development in the project area • Trekor will retain a 77.5% interest in New Prosperity and the ability to divest its interest at any time, including to other mining companies that could advance a project with the consent of the Tŝilhqot’in Nation • The agreement acknowledges Trekor’s commercial interests in the property and provides certainty with respect to how it may be developed in the future LOCATION 125 km SW of Williams Lake, British Columbia OWNERSHIP 100% *Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters. Note: The Agreement is subject to customary conditions and closing of the transaction is expected to occur in June 2025 Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Au (g/t) Cu (%) Au (M oz) Cu (B lb) Mineral Resources Effective November 2, 2009 at 0.14% Cu cut-off* Measured 547 0.46 0.27 8.1 3.3 Indicated 463 0.34 0.21 5.1 2.1 Total M&I Resources 1,010 0.41 0.24 13.3 5.3 Project Highlights
Slide 25 — Aley Niobium Project
Aley Niobium Project 25 LOCATION 140 km North of Mackenzie, British Columbia MINERAL RESERVES* 84 million tonnes grading 0.50% Nb2O5 * The NI 43-101 technical report documenting these results including tax implications and discussion was issued October 30, 2014 with an effective date of September 15, 2014, as amended and restated December 4, 2017. About Niobium • Usage in high-strength low-alloy steels, superalloys for jet engines, turbines and other aerospace, military & energy applications • Designated a critical mineral by the United States, Canada, and the European Union • Recognized by the US Department of Defense as a high priority defense-critical mineral Project Highlights1 P&P Reserves 84M tonnes grading 0.5% Nb2O5 Mine Life 24-years Annual production Capacity 14,00 tonnes of ferroniobium Project Update • Floatation Process Development - Development of a proprietary flotation process, resulting in higher niobium recoveries and reduced reagent consumption; the concentrate produced has been used to successfully produce market-grade ferroniobium • Strengthening Project Team - Steve Sparkowich joined the team to support technical development, market positioning and commercial strategy
Slide 26 — Why Invest in Trekor
Why Invest in Trekor 26 • Significant gap between asset NPV and market cap o Base NAV for Gibraltar and Florence @ US$5.50/lb copper o Not including Yellowhead, New Prosperity or Aley • Near-term copper production growth: o Gib + Florence = pro-forma EBITDA of C$900M (at US$5.50 copper) • Strong balance sheet with ~C$340 million of available liquidity and no maturities until 2030 • Highly levered to copper price • Pipeline of large-scale assets in North America • Proven operator and builder • Industry leader in safety and environmental performance $3,400 $2,500 $580 $5,320 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Gibraltar NPV8 Post Tax -100% Florence NPV8 Post Tax - 100% Net Debt Equity Value Current Market Capitalisation Trekor Valuation Waterfall ~C$1 billion Gap Gibraltar H2 2025 Annualized* Florence** Taseko Proforma ($4.80 Copper) Taseko Proforma ($5.50 Copper) Trekor EBITDA Growth (C$ millions) $350M $400M $750M +$900M Note: Florence NPV is based on US$1.6B at an FX rate of 1.35. *Based on actual second half 2025 annualized (realized price US$4.80) **Based on 85M lbs, operating costs of US$1.31/lb (C1 + royalties) at $4.80/lb copper, C$/US$ 1.35 26 The Valuation Case
Slide 27 — Appendix
Appendix
Slide 28 — Capital Structure & Coverage
US Canada Other Capital Structure & Coverage 28 Share Price C$12.62 US$8.72 52 Week High / Low C$13.60 / C$5.17 US$9.82 / US$3.66 Listed TSX:TKO / NYSE:TGB / LSE:TKO Shares Outstanding* 366 Market Capitalization C$4.6B US$3.2B Cash & Equivalents* C$186M Revolving Credit Facility US$110M** *As at June 30, 2026. **Undrawn Institutional Holdings by Geography Major Shareholders % Holding L1 Capital 9.8% Connor, Clark & Lunn 4.1% Mackenzie Financial 3.1% Global X ETF 2.9% Blackrock 2.3% Trekor Mgmt/Board 2.0% Mudita Advisors 1.2% Diamond Hill 1.1% Analyst Coverage Target Price & Recommendation Buy C$16.00 Oct ‘26 Buy C$15.00 Oct ’26 Buy C$15.00 Oct ’26 Buy C$14.00 Aug ’26 Buy C$13.50 Oct ’26 Buy C$14.50 Oct ’26 Buy C$14.00 Oct ’26 Buy C$13.50 Aug ’26 $0.00 $3.00 $6.00 $9.00 $12.00 $15.00 Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 Mar-25 Mar-26 Trekor Share Price (C$ / US$)
Slide 29 — Operating Costs
Operating Costs 29 Breakdown of Key Operating Costs Note: Gibraltar based on 2025 actual costs. Florence Copper based on 2023 Technical Report. Labour 26% Diesel 10% Consumables 31% Maintenance 24% Other 9% Gibraltar Labour 22% Sulphuric Acid 36% Consumables 22% Other 20% Florence Copper Sensitivity: Diesel – C$0.10/litre price = US$0.025/pound copper Sensitivity: Sulphuric Acid – US$100/ton price = US$0.30/pound copper
Slide 30 — Florence Copper Project – Two Phase Development Approach
Florence Copper Project – Two Phase Development Approach 30 • Issued updated 43-101 Technical Report (March) • Final UIC permit issued from US EPA (September) • Site preparation, Initial earthworks started (December) 2023 • Closed transaction with Taurus for US$50 million royalty (Q1) • Drawdown of first US$10 million of US$50 million Mitsui financing (Q1) • Commenced wellfield drilling (Q1) • Refinanced long-term debt, extending maturity until 2030 (Q2) • Begin construction of SX/EW plant (Q2) 2024 • Ongoing construction / drilling • Commence Leaching operations (October) • Commissioning SX/EW plant • First cathode production (Q4) 2025 • PTF development and construction starts (~US$25M) • Wellfield & SX/EW plant commissioned (Q3), operations commenced in (Q4) 2018 • First cathode produced (April) • Permitting process for commercial scale production begins 2019 • Completed PTF production phase • Aquifer Protection Permit issued (December) 2020 • Project financing – US$400mm debt package closed (February) • Ongoing permitting 2021 • Draft UIC permit issued from US EPA (August) 2022 • Procurement of long-lead equipment • Ongoing permitting 2023
Slide 31 — Gibraltar Mine – Acquisition of Gibraltar Minority Interest
Gibraltar Mine – Acquisition of Gibraltar Minority Interest 31 Variable payments self-funded with incremental cashflow from Gibraltar $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 (C$, millions) Illustrative Payment Schedule @ US$4.25/lb Copper Sojitz Sojitz-Contingent Dowa & Furukawa • Trekor acquired the remaining 25% interest in Gibraltar in two separate transactions: • Sojitz (12.5% interest acquired in Q1 2023) • Dowa & Furukawa (total 12.5% interest acquired in Q1 2024) • Sojitz – minimum payments of C$60M payable in six annual instalments + contingent consideration of up to C$57M • Contingent consideration based on copper price and Gibraltar mine revenues • Dowa & Furukawa – minimum payments of C$117M over ten years + contingent consideration up to C$25M • Variable annual payments based on copper price and subject to an annual cap based on % of Gibraltar cash flow • Trekor has early buy-out option (before 2029) to avoid all contingent consideration • Liability at September 30, 2025 = $145M (based on NPV) Note: Contingent payments based on US$4.25/lb copper, LOM annual production/sales & 1.35 FX.
Slide 32 — 2024
Yellowhead Copper Project 32 Estimated Development Timeline 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Permitting Decisions Application Review Phase Application Development and Review Process Planning Phase Readiness Decision Phase / Impact Assessment Determination / Substitution Decision Early Engagement and Planning Phase Pre-Early Engagement Engineering for EA and Permitting Engagement with First Nations, Government and Public Yellowhead Is Here Final Investment Decision
Slide 33 — Credit Profile
Credit Profile 33 Substantial improvement in leverage metrics expected with increasing EBITDA and Florence construction capex complete • Trekor maintains reasonable leverage levels and balances capital needs through a combination of debt, equity and internally generated cash flow • Net Debt / LTM EBITDA metrics peaked at completion of Florence Copper capital spending • Cash on hand of C$186M expected to fund short- and medium-term capital needs • RCF of US$110M (November 2027 maturity) undrawn 2030 Notes Principal Amount: US$500 million Coupon: 8.25% Maturity: 6 years (Apr 2030) Issuer Ratings: Moody’s / S&P / Fitch : B3 / B - / B -; Outlooks : Stable / Stable / Stable Optional Redemption Non-callable for 2.5 years, then callable at par plus 50% of the coupon, declining ratably thereafter Special Redemption Feature: Issuer may redeem 10% of the principal per annum at a price equal to 103% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest) during 2.5-year non-call period Use of Proceeds To redeem all outstanding principal of 7.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2026, to make capital expenditures, including at Florence Copper and the Gibraltar mine, to fund working capital and to pay fees and expenses in connection with this offering, with any remaining amounts to be used for general corporate purposes. $224 $230 $155 $169 $230 $290 $396 2024 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 Q1 2026 Q2 2026 2.8x 2.4x 4.6x 4.6x 2.4x 2.0x 1.5x 2024 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 Q1 2026 Q2 2026 Net Debt / LTM Adjusted EBITDA (x) LTM Adjusted EBITDA
Slide 34 — Proactively Reducing Impact of Cu Price Volatility
Proactively Reducing Impact of Cu Price Volatility 34 Hedging policy in place to reduce the short-term impact of a decline in the price of copper Defensive Hedging Strategy • Trekor’s hedging strategy is designed to secure a minimum price for a significant portion of their near- term production through the purchase of copper put options o Active hedging strategy in place since 2009 o Maintains exposure to increases in the price of copper o Outstanding options: −Q2/26 – 54M lbs at a floor of US$4.00/lb and a ceiling of US$5.40/lb −Q3/26 – 24M lbs at a floor of US$4.75/lb and a ceiling of US$7.50/lb and US$8.50/lb • Additionally, ~80% of Gibraltar operating costs are C$ denominated, providing a natural hedge against US$ metal price volatility 75 60 65 60 48 60 79 73 72 84 108 78 107 100 106 94 94 92 84 86 108 106 98 112.5 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Cu Put Options Attributable Cu Production Historical Copper Hedging and Cu Production (Mlbs) (1) Options have only been purchased for Q1-Q3/26 to-date. Production guidance for 2026 is 110-115 million pounds. 1
Slide 35 — 2025 Sustainability Highlights: Growth with Purpose
2025 Sustainability Highlights: Growth with Purpose 35
Slide 36 — A Proven Team of Mine Builders and Value Creators
A Proven Team of Mine Builders and Value Creators 36 Senior Management Stuart McDonald, CPA President & CEO, Director Mining executive with 25 years of experience in mining, financial, corporate development and management roles. He joined Trekor as CFO in 2013 and was appointed President & CEO in 2021. Previously CFO of Quadra FNX Mining, and CFO of Yukon Zinc. Richard Tremblay, P.Eng Chief Operating Officer Professional engineer and experienced senior level executive with over 30 years in the mining industry. Strong operations background in Open Pit Mining as well as mineral Processing. Joined Trekor as General Manager, Gibraltar Mine in 2014. Previously held senior operational roles with Teck over 20 years. Bryce Hamming, CFA, CPA Chief Financial Officer Joined in 2018, with over 20 years experience in corporate finance, corporate development, treasury, tax and financial reporting oversight. Most recently a financial adviser to Seaspan Corp., with prior roles as CFO of Northcliff Resources, and Ernst & Young LLP’s mining transaction advisory group. Rob Rotzinger, P.Eng Vice President, Capital Projects Professional Engineer who has been employed with Trekor and predecessor companies for the past 18 years. A key participant in the $800 million capital investment program at Gibraltar Mine, including GDP3, a $325 million project. Responsible for execution of the Florence capital project. Ron Thiessen – Chairman • President, CEO and Director of Northern Dynasty Minerals. • Chartered Professional Accountant with professional experience in finance, taxation, mergers, acquisitions and re-organizations. • CEO and Director of Hunter Dickinson Inc, a company providing management and administrative services to several publicly traded companies. Russell Hallbauer • Former President & CEO of Trekor Metals. • Formerly with Teck Cominco as General Manager Base Metal Joint Ventures for Teck Cominco’s interests in Highland Valley Copper (Canada) and Antamina (Peru) and General Manager, Coal Operations. Ken Pickering • Professional Engineer and mining executive with 45 years of experience in the natural resources industry, building and operating major mining operations in Canada, Chile, Australia, Peru and the US. • 39 year career with BHP Billiton Base Metals, including President of Minera Escondida Ltda. Peter Mitchell • Chartered Professional Accountant with over 35 years of senior financial management experience. • Former CFO of Trekor Metals and Senior Vice President and CFO of Coeur Mining. Rita Maguire • Lawyer based in Arizona and focused on water, environmental, mining and administrative law. • Formerly Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources, Deputy Chief of Staff for Governor of Arizona, and Oil Trading Department of Conoco-Philips. Bob Dickinson • An economic geologist who has been actively involved in mineral exploration and mine development for over 45 years and was inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in 2012. • Founder & Chairman of Hunter Dickinson Inc. Anu Dhir • A co-founder and executive of ZinQ Mining, a private base metals and precious metals royalty company. Previously VP, Corp Dev at Katanga Mining. • Graduate of the General Management Program (GMP) at Harvard Business School, she has a law degree (Juris Doctor). Crystal Smith • Chief Councillor of the Haisla Nation • Led the Haisla Nation’s involvement with LNG Canada, the first LNG export facility on Canada’s West Coast, and was instrumental in Cedar LNG, the world’s first Indigenous majority-owned LNG project Board of Directors
Slide 37 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 37 Gibraltar Florence Copper Category Short Tons (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Mo (%) Cu (billions lbs) Sulphide Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2025 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Proven 414 0.26 0.007 2.1 Probable 167 0.22 0.008 0.7 Ore Stockpiles 6 0.20 0.009 0.0 Total P&P Sulphide Reserves 587 0.25 0.008 2.9 Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2025 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Measured 743 0.25 0.007 3.7 Indicated 332 0.23 0.007 1.5 M&I Resources 1,076 0.25 0.007 5.3 Inferred 75 0.22 0.004 0.3 Category Short Tons (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Cu (billions lbs) Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2025 Proven 258 0.35 1.8 Probable 63 0.40 0.5 Total P&P Reserves 320 0.36 2.3 Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2025 Measured 292 0.34 2.0 Indicated 71 0.39 0.6 M&I Resources 363 0.35 2.5 Inferred 42 0.32 0.3 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, Vice President, Engineering for Trekor and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Gibraltar Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2021 have been depleted and adjusted to reflect mining from 2022 through 2025 as documented in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. 3. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 4. Sulphide Mineral Reserves are exclusive of Oxide Mineral Reserves and are contained within Mineral Resources. 5. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 6. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$3.05/lb Cu price, $12.00/lb Mo price, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 85% TCu and 40% Mo for sulphide ore and 50% ASCu for oxide ore. 7. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” pit using the following assumptions: Cu price of US$3.50/lb, Mo price of US$14.00/lb, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 85% for TCu and 40% for Mo. 8. A tonnage factor of 12ft3/ton has been applied for rock and 15ft3/ton for overburden and fill. 9. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, Vice President, Engineering for Trekor and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Florence Copper Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources effective December 31, 2022 are documented in the Florence Copper Technical Report and have been depleted to reflect PTF rinsing and commercial wellfield operations from 2023 through 2025 as documented in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. 3. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 4. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 5. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 6. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using ISCR extraction methods using the following assumptions: $3.05 Cu price, $31,600/acre for core hole abandonment, $240,400/acre for cultural mitigations in identified Cultural Sites, $149,600 + $263/foot well drilling costs, $160/ton acid cost, $45.30/ton acid applied for well field operating costs, 1.2% surface losses, $0.10/lb Cu for electrowinning cost, $0.12/lb Cu G&A cost, $0.69/ton reclamation cost, $0.02/lb Cu shipping cost, 7% NSR royalties on ALSD land, 3% NSR royalties on freehold land, and 2.5% royalties on net profit. 7. Mineral Resources are confined to the Oxide and Transition zones inside a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” boundary assuming ISCR extraction methods using the following assumptions: $3.50 Cu price, $31,600/acre for core hole abandonment, $240,400/acre for cultural mitigations in identified Cultural Sites, $149,600 + $263/foot well drilling costs, $160/ton acid cost, $45.30/ton acid applied for well field operating costs, 1.2% surface losses, $0.10/lb Cu for electrowinning cost, $0.12/lb Cu G&A cost, $0.69/ton reclamation cost, $0.02/lb Cu shipping cost, 7% NSR royalties on ALSD land, 3% NSR royalties on freehold land, and 2.5% royalties on net profit. 8. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported without a cut-off grade to reflect the nature of the ISCR extraction method proposed. 9. Tonnage factors of 13.5 ft3/ton and 13.13 ft3/ton have been applied corresponding to 8% porosity in the upper oxide zone and 5% porosity in the lower oxide and transition zones. 10. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Slide 38 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 38 Yellowhead Aley 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Jeremy Guichon, P. Eng., Director, Mine Engineering for Trekor and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Yellowhead Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 3. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 4. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 5. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on the following assumption: Metal prices of US$2.85/lb Cu, US$1,610/oz Au and US$18.75/oz Ag; a foreign exchange rate of C$1.30 : US$1.00; average metal recoveries of 90% for copper, 36% for gold and 59% for silver; combined processing, G&A and water treatment costs of C$7.40/t milled; pit-rim mining costs of C$2.33/t of overburden, C$2.28/t of non-PAG waste, C$2.79/t of PAG waste and C$2.07/t of ore with a bench increment of C$0.035/t mined per bench and sustaining capital allowance of C$0.20/t mined; average offsite costs of C$0.48/lb of copper; payable metal terms of 96.1% for copper, 90% for gold and 90% for silver; and overall pit slopes of 30 to 40 degrees. 6. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a Lerchs-Grossman pit optimization to meet “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” using the following assumptions: Metal prices of US$4.25/lb Cu, US$2,400/oz Au and US$28.00/oz Ag; a foreign exchange rate of C$1.30 : US$1.00; average metal recoveries of 89% for copper, 35% for gold and 59% for silver; combined processing and G&A costs of C$7.40/t milled; and pit-rim mining cost of C$2.31/t mined with a bench increment of C$0.035/t mined. 7. Bulk density is estimated by lithology and ranges between 2.71 t/m3 and 2.85 t/m3 in rock and 2.2 t/m3 in overburden. 8. Numbers may not add due to rounding. Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Cu (billion lbs) Mineral Reserves Effective June 15, 2025 at a 0.17% Cu cut-off Proven 458 0.29 0.031 1.3 2.9 Probable 359 0.26 0.028 1.2 2.1 Total P&P Reserves 817 0.28 0.030 1.3 5.0 Mineral Resources Effective June 15, 2025 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Measured 561 0.27 0.029 1.2 3.3 Indicated 735 0.24 0.027 1.2 3.8 Total M&I Resources 1,296 0.25 0.028 1.2 7.1 Inferred 111 0.24 0.026 1.2 0.6 Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Nb205 (%) Nb (million kg) Mineral Reserves Effective September 15, 2014 at a 0.30% Nb2O5 cut-off Proven 44 0.52 160 Probable 40 0.48 131 Total P&P Reserves 84 0.50 291 Mineral Resources Effective September 15, 2014 at a 0.20% Nb2O5 cut-off Measured 113 0.41 323 Indicated 173 0.35 424 Total M&I Resources 286 0.37 747 Inferred 144 0.32 323 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Scott Jones, P. Eng., former Vice President, Engineering for Trekor and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Aley Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 3. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 4. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 5. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$45.00/kg Nb price, exchange rate of US$0.90=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 65.4%, total operating costs of $55.79 per tonne milled. 6. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” pit using the following assumptions: US$50.00/kg Nb price, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recovery of 67% Nb, operating cost of $57.00 per tonne milled and pit slopes of 45 degrees. 7. Densities were modeled based on modeled lithologies and range from 2.88 t/m3 to 2.90 t/m3 except for overburden which uses a density of 2.0 t/m3. 8. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Slide 39 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 39 New Prosperity 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Scott Jones, P. Eng., former Vice President, Engineering for Trekor and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. New Prosperity Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 4. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$1.25/lb Cu price, US$500/oz Au price, exchange rate of US$0.74=C$1.00, mining cost of C$1.20/t plus a bench increment of $0.03/t mined, Milling and G&A cost of $4.20/t milled and metallurgical recoveries of 90% Cu and 70% Au. 5. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 6. Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters. Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Au (g/t) Cu (%) Au (M oz) Cu (B lb) Mineral Reserves Effective November 2, 2009 at a C$5.50 NSR/t cut-off Proven 481 0.46 0.26 7.1 2.8 Probable 350 0.35 0.18 3.9 1.4 Total P&P Reserves 831 0.41 0.23 11.0 4.2 Mineral Resources Effective November 2, 2009 at 0.14% Cu cut-off Measured 547 0.46 0.27 8.1 3.3 Indicated 463 0.34 0.21 5.1 2.1 Total M&I Resources 1,010 0.41 0.24 13.3 5.3
Slide 40 — Appendix – NI 43-101 Compliance
Appendix – NI 43-101 Compliance 40 • Unless stated otherwise, Trekor Metals Limited (the “Company”) has prepared the technical information in this presentation including Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates (“Technical Information”) based on information contained in the technical reports, news releases and Annual Information Form (collectively the “Disclosure Documents”) available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by or under the supervision of a qualified person (“Qualified Person”) as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”). For readers to fully understand the information in this presentation, they should read the technical reports identified below in their entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions, and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this presentation which qualifies the Technical Information. The Disclosure Documents and this presentation are each intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents. • Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates are shown on a 100 percent basis for each project. The Measured and Indicated Resource Estimates are inclusive of those Mineral Resources that have been converted to Mineral Reserves. All estimates are current as of their stated effective date in their corresponding technical reports with the exception of those for the Gibraltar Mine and Florence Copper which reflect mining depletion since the effective date as documented in the Company’s most recent Annual Information Form. Estimates for all projects are prepared by or under the supervision of a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101. Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates for all projects have been calculated using metal prices, foreign exchange, recoveries, and costs as stated in their respective technical reports. • For further Technical Information on the Company’s properties, refer to the following technical reports, each of which is available on the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. • Gibraltar Mine: technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine, British Columbia, Canada” issued March 30, 2022 with an effective date of March 15, 2022 prepared under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA. • Florence Copper Project: technical report entitled “NI 43‐101 Technical Report, Florence Copper Project, Pinal County, Arizona” issued March 30, 2023 with an effective date of March 15, 2023 prepared under the supervision of Richard Tremblay, P.Eng., MBA, Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, and Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng. • Yellowhead Copper Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report Update on the Yellowhead Copper Project, British Columbia, Canada” issued July 10, 2025 with an effective date of June 15, 2025 prepared under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, Jeremy Guichon, P.Eng., and Adil Cheema, P.Eng. • Aley Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project, British Columbia, Canada” issued October 30, 2014 with an effective date of September 15, 2014, as amended and restated December 4, 2017 prepared under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng., Keith Merriam, P.Eng., Greg Yelland, P.Eng., Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng., and Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo. • New Prosperity Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report on the 344 Million Tonne Increase in Mineral Reserves at the Prosperity Gold-Copper Project, British Columbia, Canada” issued December 17, 2009 with an effective date of November 2, 2009 prepared under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng. Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters.
Slide 41 — Investor Relations
Investor Relations Brian Bergot, Vice President, Investor Relations Office: 778.373.4554 Email: [email protected] TSX: TKO NYSE: TGB LSE: TKO Keep up with the latest news and project updates from Trekor @TrekorMetals Scan to Subscribe
Slide 42 — Thank You!
Thank You!