Inferra AI / Company / TGB / Slides
Taseko Mines — January 2026 Corporate Presentation Download (company IR deck)
Taseko Mines (TGB) · 41 slides · Filed Oct 29, 2026
Every slide of this earnings presentation, with the text as published. Open the original deck ↗ · All TGB deck slides
Slide 1 — Building North America’s
Building North America’s Low-Cost Multi-Asset Copper Producer January 2026
Slide 2 — Disclaimer
Disclaimer This presentation contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Legislation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act and 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which may not be based on historical fact, including without limitation, statements regarding our expectations in respect to future financial position, business strategy, future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities, events or developments that we expect to take place in the future, projected costs and plans and objectives. All information contained in this presentation, other than statements of current and historical fact, is forward-looking information. Often, but not always, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “estimate,” “scheduled,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects,” “aim” and similar expressions. All of the forward-looking information in this presentation is qualified by this cautionary note. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical facts, that address estimated mineral resource and reserve quantities, grades and contained metal, and possible future mining, exploration and development activities, are forward-looking statements. Although Taseko Mines Limited (“Taseko”) believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements should not be in any way construed as guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward- looking statements include market prices for metals, the conclusions of detailed feasibility and technical analyses, lower than expected grades and quantities of resources, mining rates and recovery rates and the lack of availability of necessary capital, which may not be available to Taseko on terms acceptable to it or at all. Taseko is subject to the specific risks inherent in the mining business as well as general economic and business conditions. For more information on Taseko, investors should review Taseko’s annual Form 40-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and its Canadian securities filings that are available at www.sedarplus.ca. This presentation contains unaudited “non-IFRS” financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA and net debt. The non-IFRS financial measures contained in this presentation are not measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) or international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”) and should not be considered as replacements or alternatives to net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity. Non-IFRS measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as substitute for, analysis of Taseko’s results reported in accordance with IFRS or otherwise. Notwithstanding these limitations, and in conjunction with other accounting and financial information available, Taseko’s management considers the non-IFRS financial measurers contained in this presentation to be reasonable indicators for comparisons between Taseko and Taseko’s principal competitors in the market. These non-IFRS measures are used by market participants for comparative analysis, albeit with certain limitations, of the results of businesses in the sector and as indicators of Taseko’s capacity to generate cash flow. Nevertheless, non-IFRS financial measures do not have any standardized meaning and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. 2
Slide 3 — Taseko – Investment Highlights
C A N A D A U N I T E D S T A T E S Arizona Producing Near Term Development Aley Gibraltar Yellowhead British Columbia Florence Copper New Prosperity Taseko – Investment Highlights 3 Building a Multi-Asset, North American Copper Producer Gibraltar A Large-Scale Copper Mine with Proven Through-the- Cycle Sustainability Florence Copper Commissioning / Ramp up – First Copper Production est. Early 2026 Commitment to Strong Environmental, Social & Safety Performance Strong Copper Market Proven Team of Mine Builders & Operators Focused in North America Strong Financial Profile Taseko Highlights
Slide 4 — Capital Structure & Coverage
US Canada Other Capital Structure & Coverage 4 Share Price C$10.10 US$7.25 52 Week High / Low C$10.30 / C$2.38 US$7.43 / US$1.67 Listed TSX:TKO / NYSE:TGB / LSE:TKO Shares Outstanding 360M Market Capitalization C$3.6B US$2.6B Cash & Equivalents* C$216M Revolving Credit Facility US$110M** *Proforma balance sheet at Sept 30, 2025 reflecting equity financing and repayment of the RCF **Undrawn Institutional Holdings by Geography Major Shareholders % Holding L1 Capital 9.1% Fourth Sail NA Global X ETF 2.3% Renaissance Technologies 2.1% Taseko Mgmt/Board 2.0% Mackenzie Financial 1.9% Connor, Clark & Lunn 1.8% Diamond Hill 1.5% Major Shareholders Analyst Coverage Target Price & Recommendation Buy C$10.00 Jan ’26 Buy C$12.75 Jan ’26 Hold C$6.66 Nov ’25 Buy C$7.25 Nov ’25 Buy C$8.50 Jan ’26 Buy C$6.50 Nov ’25 Buy C$7.25 Nov ’25 Buy C$10.25 Jan ’26 $0.00 $2.75 $5.50 $8.25 $11.00 Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 Mar-25 Taseko Share Price (C$ / US$) Panmure Liberum
Slide 5 — Copper Price Outlook
Copper Price Outlook 5 Recent copper price strength driven by: Structural Demand Trends • Electrification boom — electric vehicles, renewable energy, and grid upgrades require large amounts of copper • Data center expansion — AI and cloud computing are increasing power infrastructure demand • Growing urbanization — especially in Asia, supporting construction and infrastructure needs Supply Constraints • Limited new mine development — years of under-investment means fewer new projects coming online • Declining ore grades — existing mines are producing lower-quality ore, increasing costs • Operational disruptions — permitting delays, labor issues, water constraints, and political instability in major producing countries (Chile, Peru) Supply Constraints • Investor interest — copper increasingly viewed as a long-term energy transition asset • Commodity cycles — after pandemic-era surpluses cleared, inventories are now relatively low $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 LME Copper Price (US$/lb) Average: $2.44 Average: $4.18
Slide 6 — Copper Price Outlook
Copper Price Outlook 6 Copper Demand & Electrification • The world is electrifying: global electricity consumption will increase by almost 50% by 2040 – faster than any other form of energy • Global copper demand is projected to rise 50% by 2040, growing from 28 million metric tons today to 42 million, driven by four vectors: core economic demand, the energy transition and addition (renewables, EVs, grid expansion), AI and data centers and defense modernization Copper Supply • Without improvement in above ground risks and significant new investment, a 10 million metric ton supply shortfall is projected by 2040 • Without new mine development or expansion of existing assets, primary mined supply could increase from 23 million metric tons in 2025 to a peak of 27 million in 2030, then decline to 22 million by 2040 Supply Constraints • Average copper mine takes 17 years from discovery to production, with much time spent on permitting, environmental reviews, and community consultations • Inflation, lower ore grades, and deeper and more remote mining increase costs, raising the copper price needed to incentivize new supply Highlights from S&P Global Copper Study (January 2026) Net change in global copper demand vector (2025 vs 2040) Change in demand by sector (millions, metric tonnes) Note: S&P Global (1) Includes copper demand from construction, cooling, appliances, fossil power generation, machinery and ICE vehicles. 2. Includes copper demand from clean technologies, T&D and EVs.
Slide 7 — Copper Price Outlook
Copper Price Outlook 7 • Mining faces declining ore grades, rising costs, and increasingly complex extraction conditions. Without significant new investment, output from existing mines will decline • While copper’s recyclability offers additional supply, such secondary supply alone cannot close the gap. Even with very aggressive improvements in collection and processing, recycling could provide at best only about a third of total supply by 2040 • Smelting and refining capacity, especially concentrated in China, have become critical nodes in the supply chain Copper price well-positioned to benefit from favourable long-term supply-demand dynamics Source: S&P Global Note: Recycled supply represents end-of-life scrap. Mined supply includes operating production and risked production from committed, probable and possible projects.
Slide 8 — A foundation of stable
Gibraltar Copper Mine – British Columbia A foundation of stable cashflow 8 MINE TYPE Open Pit – Cu/Mo STAGE Producing ANNUAL PRODUCTION 130Mlbs (~60kt Cu) CASH COSTS (LOM) US$2.30/lb MINE LIFE 19 Years REPLACEMENT VALUE +US$1 billion1 1. Calculated using US$15,000 / ton capacity multiplied by capacity of 85,000 tons.
Slide 9 — Gibraltar Copper Mine – Large-Scale, Steady-State Mine
Gibraltar Copper Mine – Large-Scale, Steady-State Mine Value Creation • Acquired Gibraltar in 1999 for $1 • Restarted the mine in 2004 • Between 2006 and 2013, invested C$800 million to expand and modernize the mine to 85,000 tons per day • Operating steady-state at expanded capacity since 2014 • Purchased 25% of mine from joint venture partners, increasing ownership to 100% as of March 2024 • NPV8 after-tax estimated at C$1.5 billion1 • One of the industry leaders in Health & Safety and Environmental: o John Ash Award for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2020 & 2021 (1M hours worked with lowest injury frequency rate in BC) o MABC and the Province of BC Mining & Sustainability Award o September 2020 - Jake McDonald Annual Award for Metal Mine Reclamation from the British Columbia Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Gibraltar Copper Production Statistics Modernization & Expansion Period Post Expansion Source: Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine, March 2022. (1) Gibraltar NPV using an 8% discount rate and long-term copper price of US$3.50/lb 9
Slide 10 — Gibraltar Mine – Cash Flow Growth from Stable Mining Operation
Gibraltar Mine – Cash Flow Growth from Stable Mining Operation Leverage to copper has resulted in strong earnings growth and cash flow generation • Gibraltar is a foundation of stable cash flow for the Company throughout the copper price cycle • Taseko has maintained positive operating cash flow throughout extended periods of weak copper prices through stringent cost management practices • Many input costs are correlated with the copper price (i.e. Oil, shipping rates, C$:US$ exchange rate) serving as a natural hedge • Cash flow highly sensitive to copper price – US$0.25/lb increase in copper price equates to a ~C$45M increase in cash flow Recent Results • 2024 Adj. EBITDA of C$224 million, Earnings from mining operations of $244 million and Cash flows operations of $233 million • Q3/25 copper production of 28M lbs – 39% higher than prior quarter, and further increase expected in Q4 • Q3/25 Adj. EBITDA of $62M and Earnings from mining operations* of $67M • 2025 production guidance is 100-105 Mlbs (1) C$, millions. Based on LoM average production of 130M lbs copper and 1.40 C$/US$ FX rate. 10 * Before depletion, amortization and non-recurring items. $200 $400 $600 $800 $4.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5.50 $6.00 Copper Price (US$/lb) Operating Margin1 (C$) $2.60 $2.40 $2.20 C1 Cash Costs (US$):
Slide 11 — Pathway to a
11 Florence Copper Project – Arizona Pathway to a low-cost future MINE TYPE In-situ Leach STAGE Commissioning PROCESSING SX/EW PRODUCTION (PER YEAR) 85Mlb (~40kt) Cu ESTIMATED CASH COSTS US$1.11/lb LOM MINE LIFE 22 Years
Slide 12 — Florence Copper Project – A Near Term, Low Cost Copper Project
Florence Copper Project – A Near Term, Low Cost Copper Project Project Highlights • Fully-permitted in late 2023 • Commenced construction in January 2024 – substantial completion achieved in September 2025 • Successful execution of construction plan – on time and final capex inline with budget • A major new source of US-based copper cathode production at a time when the price of copper is near all-time highs • Production ramping up in 2026 Project Economics1 • 43-101 Technical Report (March 30, 2023) details: o A 22-year mine life o Annual production capacity of 85 million pounds (~40k metric tonnes) of copper cathode o After-tax NPV(8%) of US$930 million @ US$3.75/lb copper o After-tax IRR of 47% and a 2.6 year payback o LOM Operating Costs (C1) of US$1.11/lb (1) Based on the Florence 43-101 Technical Report with an effective date of March 15, 2023. 12
Slide 13 — Florence Copper Project – Construction Update
Florence Copper Project – Construction Update 13 Construction • Substantial Completion of SX/EW plant and infrastructure achieved by general contractor in September – de-mobilization of site construction crews commenced • 90 injection and recovery wells drilled and fully constructed • Zero lost time incidents or reportable environmental incidents on the project to-date Commissioning / Operations • Final approvals required to commence wellfield operations received in mid-October from regulatory agencies • Wellfield operations began ramping up in early November • SX/EW plant commissioning and wellfield acidification to take ~3 months – on target to produce first copper cathode in early 2026 • Recruiting of full-time employees ongoing – on target to reach full complement of staff by end of 2025 (~200 employees) Construction Contracts $105 Contingency $26 Indirect & Owners Costs $29 Materials $37 Wellfield Drilling $35 Construction Capex • Last published Construction cost estimate = US$232M (basis Q3 2022 costing, per March 2023 Technical Report) • In Q1 2024 guidance was provided that costs were expected to be 10%- 15% higher • Final cost ~15% higher than 2023 estimate – general inflation
Slide 14 — In-Situ Copper Recovery (“ISCR”)
First Cathode Harvest In-Situ Copper Recovery (“ISCR”) Production Test Facility (“PTF”) • $25M PTF constructed in 2018 and operated for 18 months • The PTF consisted of a wellfield and SX/EW plant o 24 wells: 4 injection wells, 9 recovery wells, and 11 groundwater monitoring-related wells • Operation of the PTF has proven the ability to establish and maintain hydraulic control of fluid within the oxidized zone • Valuable information and data on initial leach periods, sweep efficiencies and recoveries was collected to inform future commercial scale operations • The PTF plant operated at a high average availability and produced a total of 1.1 million pounds of high-grade copper cathode product from the ISCR leach solutions 14 April 24, 2019
Slide 15 — Benefits of ISCR
Benefits of ISCR 15 Arizona Conventional Open-pit Mine vs. Florence Copper Project Other Benefits: • Low cost • Small environmental footprint (less than a square mile) • Numerous site redevelopment opportunities (post closure) • Limited land disturbance • Low dust emissions • No downstream freight, smelting, or refinery requirements Finalist for Arizona Environmental Excellence Awards Arizona Forward
Slide 16 — Florence Copper Project – 2026 Ramp Up
Florence Copper Project – 2026 Ramp Up 16 Wellfield Ramp Up • Commencing operations with ~90 wells • Wellfield acidification commenced in November • SX/EW plant expected to begin operating in late January • Wellfield drilling restarting in Q4/25 – new wells to begin phasing into operation throughout 2026 • ~100 wells per year to be drilled on an ongoing basis (LOM average) • Target is to produce ~85 million pounds (design capacity) in 2027 SX/EW Plant 0 25 50 75 100 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 First 5 Years of Production1 (millions pounds) (1) Based on the Florence 43-101 Technical Report with an effective date of March 15, 2023. Wellfield Schematic
Slide 17 — Florence Copper Project
17 Florence Copper Project Strategic Partnership with Mitsui • Provided US$50 million of construction financing (Deal closed December 2023) • Strong endorsement of project valuation: o Initial US$50 million investment for 2.67% copper stream plus an offtake contract for 81% of the copper cathode produced during the initial years of operation o Mitsui has the option to invest an additional US$50 million (for total investment of US$100 million) to convert the stream to a 10% joint venture interest o Implies ~US$1 billion project value • Mitsui and Florence Copper to develop sales channels for ‘green copper’ in the USA, leveraging Florence’s low-carbon production. • 8% pre-tax cost of capital (at US$4.00/lb copper) About Mitsui: Mitsui & Co., Ltd. is a Japanese multinational conglomerate with a global presence, operating as a diversified trading, investment, and service enterprise with a presence in 62 countries and regions. Its business spans various sectors, including mineral and metal resources, machinery, chemicals, energy, and lifestyle, and it engages in activities like product sales, logistics, financing, infrastructure development, and project coordination. $3.50 $4.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5.50 $6.00 $6.50 LME vs COMEX LME Comex • Import tariffs on copper cathodes to be reviewed by June 30, 2026 • 15% Import tariff to be imposed on January 1, 2027 and 30% on January 1, 2028 Copper Cathodes Exempt from Tariffs Announcement 50% Tariff on Copper Imports Announced
Slide 18 — Looking to the Future
Taseko Mines Looking to the Future 18
Slide 19 — Yellowhead Copper Project
Yellowhead Copper Project 19 Project Highlights • Advanced stage project acquired by Taseko in 2019 for C$16 million in Taseko shares • Located in close proximity to rail and highway • In July 2025, Taseko announced improved economics and commencement of environmental assessment process Technical Study Highlights (June 2025)1 • Initial capital cost of C$2.0 billion • After-tax NPV8 of C$2.0 billion @ US$4.25/lb copper • 25-year mine life, with LOM strip ratio of 1.4:1 • Onsite operating cost of C$12.89 per tonne milled • Annual production of 206M lbs copper in first 5 years, LOM average of 178M lbs • Total Cash Costs (C1) of US$1.62/lb over the first five years of operation and US$1.90/lb over the LOM • Before-tax free cash flow of C$2.8 billion in first five years and $10.1 billion over the LOM LOCATION 150 km NE of Kamloops, British Columbia MINE TYPE Open-pit MINE OWNERSHIP 100% MINE LIFE 25 Years LIFE OF MINE PRODUCTION1 4.4 billion pounds recoverable copper; 282 koz gold; 19 Moz silver (1) Based on the Technical Report Update on the Yellowhead Copper Project, British Columbia, Canada, dated July 10th, 2025 which has an effective date of June 15, 2025.
Slide 20 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked
20 A top tier copper project in quality jurisdiction • Ranks comparably among other North and South American copper development projects • Minimal value being ascribed for Yellowhead by analysts / zero value in Taseko equity • As development timeline and financing strategy become clearer, expect market to support a higher valuation Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked (1) Bubble size represents annual copper production (2) Market Capitalization used for single asset companies, analyst consensus used for Yellowhead, Santo Domingo and Copper World. ello hea ase o opper World ( udbay) Santa ru (Ivanhoe Electric) Santo omingo ( apstone) North Island (Northisle) actus (Ari ona Sonoran) opper reek (Faraday) 2 2 .5 . .5 2. 2.5 . .5 IRR ( ) NP ( ) . .5 . .5 2. 2.5 . Santa ru Santo omingo opper World actus North Island opper reek ellowhead Project Economics (After-tax)1 C$ Market Cap / Analyst Consensus Value2
Slide 21 — Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked
21 Yellowhead Copper Project – Value to be Unlocked • Advance environmental assessment review process which was commenced in July 2025 • New technical report (issued July 2025) • Continue technical optimization and improvements • Ongoing community engagement 2025 Project Initiatives
Slide 22 — New Prosperity Gold-Copper Project
New Prosperity Gold-Copper Project 22 Project Highlights • One of the largest undeveloped Copper-Gold porphyries in the world • Life of mine average annual production of +400,000 gold equivalent ounces over a 33 year mine life (based on 2009 Technical Report*) Recent Development • Agreement signed with the Tŝilhqot'in Nation and Province of BC (June 2025) • Taseko to receive a $75 million payment from the Province of BC • Taseko will contribute a 22.5% equity interest in New Prosperity to a trust for the future benefit of the Tŝilhqot'in Nation. The trust will transfer the property interest to the Tŝilhqot’in Nation when and if it consents to a proposal to pursue mineral development in the project area • Taseko will retain a 77.5% interest in New Prosperity and the ability to divest its interest at any time, including to other mining companies that could advance a project with the consent of the Tŝilhqot’in Nation • The agreement acknowledges Taseko’s commercial interests in the New Prosperity property and provides certainty with respect to how it may be developed in the future LOCATION 125 km SW of Williams Lake, British Columbia OWNERSHIP 100% *Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters. Note: The Agreement is subject to customary conditions and closing of the transaction is expected to occur in June 2025 Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Au (g/t) Cu (%) Au (M oz) Cu (B lb) Mineral Resources Effective November 2, 2009 at 0.14% Cu cut-off* Measured 547 0.46 0.27 8.1 3.3 Indicated 463 0.34 0.21 5.1 2.1 Total M&I Resources 1,010 0.41 0.24 13.3 5.3
Slide 23 — Why Invest in Taseko – The Valuation Case
Why Invest in Taseko – The Valuation Case • Significant gap between asset NPV and market cap o Base NAV for Gibraltar and Florence @ US$4.50/lb copper o Not including Yellowhead, New Prosperity or Aley • Near-term copper production growth: o Gib + Florence = pro-forma EBITDA of C$550m (at US$4.00 copper) • Strong balance sheet with ~C$370 million of available liquidity*** and no maturities until 2030 • Highly levered to copper price • Pipeline of large-scale assets in North America • Proven operator and builder • Industry leader in safety and environmental performance $2,600 $1,800 $631 $3,769 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 Gibraltar NPV8 Post Tax -100% Florence NPV8 Post Tax - 100% Net Debt*** Equity Value Current Market Capitalisation Taseko Valuation Waterfall ~C$0.8 billion Gap Note: Florence NPV is based on US$1.2B at an FX rate of 1.35. *Based on actual 2024 actual Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted for 15M lbs lost production at $4.15/lb copper **Based on 85M lbs, operating costs of US$1.31/lb (C1 + royalties) at $4.15/lb copper, C$/US$ 1.35 *** Proforma balance sheet at Sept 30, 2025 reflecting the financing and repayment of the RCF Gibraltar 2024* Florence** Taseko Proforma ($4.15 Copper) Taseko Proforma ($4.50 Copper) Taseko EBITDA Growth (C$ millions) $255M (100%) $325M $580M +$700M 23
Slide 24 — Appendix
24 Appendix
Slide 25 — Taseko Copper Reserves
Taseko Copper Reserves 25 Significant Value in Proven & Probable Copper Reserves • Nearly 15 billion pounds of copper in reserves • Including gold in reserves, over 19 billion pounds of copper equivalent Billions Lbs Copper Source: Publicly available information *Based on BHP acquisition value of C$8.4B Gibraltar Florence Yellowhead New Prosperity $0.00 $0.90 $1.80 $2.70 0 5 10 15 Taseko Capstone Hudbay ERO Atalaya Oz* (Market Capitalization / lb) (Billions lbs Copper) Market Cap/lb
Slide 26 — Florence Copper Project – Two Phase Development Approach
Florence Copper Project – Two Phase Development Approach • Issued updated 43-101 Technical Report (March) • Final UIC permit issued from US EPA (September) • Site preparation, Initial earthworks started (December) 2023 • Closed transaction with Taurus for US$50 million royalty (Q1) • Drawdown of first US$10 million of US$50 million Mitsui financing (Q1) • Commenced wellfield drilling (Q1) • Refinanced long-term debt, extending maturity until 2030 (Q2) • Begin construction of SX/EW plant (Q2) 2024 • Ongoing construction / drilling • Commence Leaching operations (October) • Commissioning SX/EW plant • First cathode production (Q4) 2025 26 • PTF development and construction starts (~US$25M) • Wellfield & SX/EW plant commissioned (Q3), operations commenced in (Q4) 2018 • First cathode produced (April) • Permitting process for commercial scale production begins 2019 • Completed PTF production phase • Aquifer Protection Permit issued (December) 2020 • Project financing – US$400mm debt package closed (February) • Ongoing permitting 2021 • Draft UIC permit issued from US EPA (August) 2022 • Procurement of long-lead equipment • Ongoing permitting 2023
Slide 27 — Gibraltar Mine – Acquisition of Gibraltar Minority Interest
Gibraltar Mine – Acquisition of Gibraltar Minority Interest Variable payments self-funded with incremental cashflow from Gibraltar 27 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 (C$, millions) Illustrative Payment Schedule @ US$4.25/lb Copper Sojitz Sojitz-Contingent Dowa & Furukawa • Taseko acquired the remaining 25% interest in Gibraltar in two separate transactions: • Sojitz (12.5% interest acquired in Q1 2023) • Dowa & Furukawa (total 12.5% interest acquired in Q1 2024) • Sojitz – minimum payments of C$60M payable in six annual instalments + contingent consideration of up to C$57M • Contingent consideration based on copper price and Gibraltar mine revenues • Dowa & Furukawa – minimum payments of C$117M over ten years + contingent consideration up to C$25M • Variable annual payments based on copper price and subject to an annual cap based on % of Gibraltar cash flow • Taseko has early buy-out option (before 2029) to avoid all contingent consideration • Liability at September 30, 2025 = $145M (based on NPV) Note: Contingent payments based on US$4.25/lb copper, LOM annual production/sales & 1.35 FX.
Slide 28 — Gibraltar Mine – Consolidation of Gibraltar Minority Interest
Gibraltar Mine – Consolidation of Gibraltar Minority Interest Acquisition Driving Significant Production Growth at Gibraltar 28 • Taseko has purchased the remaining 25% interest in Gibraltar in two transactions resulting in a 33% increase to Taseko’s attributable copper production • Deferred payment schedule spread over 10 years (through 2034) • Variable payments linked to copper price and Gibraltar revenue • Both transactions funded through non-interest-bearing vendor financing packages • Additional production growth from restart of SX/EW plant in 2025 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 2022A 2023A 2024* 2025** (Millions lbs) Attributable Production Growth 75% 87.5% 100% 100% * ownership From April ’2 . **Production guidance for 2025 is 110-120 million pounds. Note: See appendix for additional information about transactions.
Slide 29 — Credit Profile
Credit Profile 29 Substantial improvement in leverage metrics expected with increasing EBITDA and Florence construction capex complete • Taseko maintains reasonable leverage levels and balances capital needs through a combination of debt, equity and internally generated cash flow • Net Debt / LTM EBITDA metrics increasing with spending at Florence Copper • Cash on hand of C$216M* expected to fund short- and medium-term capital needs • RCF of US$110M (November 2027 maturity) undrawn 190 $224 $238 $224 $208 $155 $169 2023 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 2.8x 2.8x 2.2x 2.8x 3.2 4.6x 3.7x 2023 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025* Net Debt / LTM Adjusted EBITDA (x) LTM Adjusted EBITDA 2030 Notes Principal Amount: US$500 million Coupon: 8.25% Maturity: 6 years (Apr 2030) Issuer Ratings: Moody’s / S&P / Fitch : B / B - / B -; Outlooks : Stable / Stable / Stable Optional Redemption Non-callable for 2.5 years, then callable at par plus 50% of the coupon, declining ratably thereafter Special Redemption Feature: Issuer may redeem 10% of the principal per annum at a price equal to 103% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest) during 2.5-year non-call period Use of Proceeds To redeem all outstanding principal of 7.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2026, to make capital expenditures, including at Florence Copper and the Gibraltar mine, to fund working capital and to pay fees and expenses in connection with this offering, with any remaining amounts to be used for general corporate purposes. * Proforma balance sheet at Sept 30, 2025 reflecting the financing and repayment of the RCF
Slide 30 — Proactively Reducing Impact of Cu Price Volatility
Proactively Reducing Impact of Cu Price Volatility 30 Hedging policy in place to reduce the short-term impact of a decline in the price of copper Defensive Hedging Strategy • Taseko’s hedging strategy is designed to secure a minimum price for a significant portion of their near- term production through the purchase of copper put options o Active hedging strategy in place since 2009 o Maintains exposure to increases in the price of copper o Outstanding options: −Q4/25 – 26M lbs at a floor of US$4.00/lb and a ceiling of US$5.40/lb −H1/25 – 54M lbs at a floor of US$4.00/lb and a ceiling of US$5.40/lb • Additionally, ~80% of Gibraltar operating costs are C$ denominated, providing a natural hedge against US$ metal price volatility 75 60 65 60 48 60 79 73 72 84 108 54 107 100 106 94 94 92 84 86 108 101 115 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Cu Put Options Attributable Cu Production Historical Copper Hedging and Cu Production (Mlbs) (1) 2025 production guidance is 100-105 Mlbs. (2) Options have only been purchased for H1/26 to-date. Guidance has not yet been provided. 1 2
Slide 31 — 2024 Sustainability Highlights: C² (Copper x Community)
2024 Sustainability Highlights: C² (Copper x Community) 31
Slide 32 — Electric Vehicles – A Rapidly Emerging Market
Electric Vehicles – A Rapidly Emerging Market 8,000,000 EEI/IEI PEV Forecast Estimated Charge Ports 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 PEV Stock and Charging Infrastructure Needed 18 to 49 lbs 85 lbs 132 lbs 183 lbs 196 lbs 814 lbs Copper is Essential to Electric Vehicle Technology • Copper is used throughout electric vehicles, charging stations and supporting infrastructure because of the metal’s urability, high conductivity and efficiency • The increase in the electric vehicles market will significantly impact copper, with demand for the metal due to electric vehicles expected to increase by 1.7Mt by 2027 • As the world continues to move toward a sustainable and energy efficient future, copper has a major role to play, with the metal used to increase the efficiency of numerous electrical technology, from motors and transformers to solar and wind energy systems • Copper is 100% recyclable and can be used and reused without losing its important engineering qualities Conventional Car Hybrid Electric Vehicle Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Battery Electric Vehicle A Hybrid Electric Bus Battery Electric Bus Source: Copper Development Association Inc. www.copper.org 32
Slide 33 — A Proven Team of Mine Builders and Value Creators
A Proven Team of Mine Builders and Value Creators 33 Senior Management Stuart McDonald, CPA President & CEO, Director Mining executive with 25 years of experience in mining, financial, corporate development and management roles. He joined Taseko as CFO in 2013 and was appointed President & CEO in 2021. Previously CFO of Quadra FNX Mining, and CFO of Yukon Zinc. Richard Tremblay, P.Eng Chief Operating Officer Professional engineer and experienced senior level executive with over 30 years in the mining industry. Strong operations background in Open Pit Mining as well as mineral Processing. Joined Taseko as General Manager, Gibraltar Mine in 2014. Previously held senior operational roles with Teck over 20 years. Bryce Hamming, CFA, CPA Chief Financial Officer Joined in 2018, with over 20 years experience in corporate finance, corporate development, treasury, tax and financial reporting oversight. Most recently a financial adviser to Seaspan Corp., with prior roles as CFO of Northcliff Resources, and Ernst & Young LLP’s mining transaction advisory group. Rob Rotzinger, P.Eng Vice President, Capital Projects Professional Engineer who has been employed with Taseko and predecessor companies for the past 18 years. A key participant in the $800 million capital investment program at Gibraltar Mine, including GDP3, a $325 million project. Responsible for execution of the Florence capital project. Ron Thiessen – Chairman • President, CEO and Director of Northern Dynasty Minerals. • Chartered Professional Accountant with professional experience in finance, taxation, mergers, acquisitions and re- organizations. • CEO and Director of Hunter Dickinson Inc, a company providing management and administrative services to several publicly traded companies. Russell Hallbauer • Former President & CEO of Taseko Mines. • Formerly with Teck Cominco as General Manager Base Metal Joint Ventures for Teck ominco’s interests in ighland Valley Copper (Canada) and Antamina (Peru) and General Manager, Coal Operations. Ken Pickering • Professional Engineer and mining executive with 45 years of experience in the natural resources industry, building and operating major mining operations in Canada, Chile, Australia, Peru and the US. • 39 year career with BHP Billiton Base Metals, including President of Minera Escondida Ltda. Peter Mitchell • Chartered Professional Accountant with over 35 years of senior financial management experience. • Former CFO of Taseko Mines and Senior Vice President and CFO of Coeur Mining. Rita Maguire • Lawyer based in Arizona and focused on water, environmental, mining and administrative law. • Formerly Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources, Deputy Chief of Staff for Governor of Arizona, and Oil Trading Department of Conoco-Philips. Bob Dickinson • An economic geologist who has been actively involved in mineral exploration and mine development for over 45 years and was inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in 2012. • Founder and Chairman of Hunter Dickinson Inc. Anu Dhir • A co-founder and executive of ZinQ Mining, a private base metals and precious metals royalty company. Previously VP, Corp Dev at Katanga Mining. • Graduate of the General Management Program (GMP) at Harvard Business School, she has a law degree (Juris Doctor). Crystal Smith • Chief Councillor of the Haisla Nation • Led the aisla Nation’s involvement with LNG Canada, the first LNG export facility on anada’s West oast, and was instrumental in edar LNG, the world’s first Indigenous majority-owned LNG project Board of Directors
Slide 34 — Aley Niobium Project
Aley Niobium Project 34 Project Highlights • One of the world's largest niobium deposit, outside the two operating mines in Brazil • “Green" rare metal – metals like niobium, are the heart of green technology, such as wind turbines and electric vehicles • Taseko acquired the project in 2007 for C$5.4M, and after only 7 years and C$30M spent on exploration and development work, a solid feasibility study was produced on the asset Feasibility Study Highlights* • Pre-tax NPV8 of C$860M, with an IRR of 17% and a 5.5 year payback. After-tax NPV8 of C$480M, with an IRR of 14% and a 5.8 year payback • Expected operating margin of US$21/kg Nb, during peak production of 9M kg/yr Nb (in form of FeNb) Current Project Status • Ongoing optimization of technical work • Project is currently in the BC Environmental Assessment Process LOCATION 140 km North of Mackenzie, British Columbia MINE TYPE Open-pit MINE OWNERSHIP 100% MINE LIFE +24 Years MINERAL RESERVES* 84 million tonnes grading 0.50% Nb2O5 Note: See NI 43-101 Compliance and Reserves and Resources details in Appendix on Pages 32 & 34. * The NI 43-101 technical report documenting these results including tax implications and discussion was issued October 30, 2014 with an effective date of September 15, 2014, as amended and restated December 4, 2017.
Slide 35 — Jurisdiction Exposure – 2019 Fraser Institute
Jurisdiction Exposure – 2019 Fraser Institute 35 Taseko’s exposure sits on the 1st quartile of the Fraser Institute’s Investment Attractiveness Index • The Investment Attractiveness Index is a composite index that combines the Policy Perception Index and the Best Practices Mineral Potential Index, weighted as 40% and 60% respectively 0 25 50 75 100 Tanzania Chubut La Rioja Guatemala Dom. Republic Zambia Venezuela DRC Mali Nicaragua Mendoza Rio Negro Zimbabwe California Jujuy Washington New Brunswick New Mexico Neuquen Ecuador Colombia Namibia PNG Santa Cruz Nova Scotia Burkina Faso Minnesota Montana Bolivia New South Wales Brazil Botswana Catamarca Victoria New Zealand Greenland South Africa Guyana Mexico Suriname Salta NW Territories Manitoba France Colorado Norway Alberta Wyoming Newfoundland Indonesia Nunavut Bulgaria Peru Yukon Tasmania San Juan Guinea (Conakry) British Columbia Quebec Chile Ontario Queensland Utah Northern Territory Turkey Saskatchewan Sweden Arizona Idaho Ireland South Australia Portugal Alaska Nevada Finland Western Australia Index Investment Attractiveness Index 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile Best Practices Mineral Potential Index 76 73 74 79 81 69 81 78 79 78 0 50 100 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Index Policy Perception Index 75 77 74 76 72 88 91 85 92 90 0 50 100 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Index British Columbia Arizona Source: 2019 Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies.
Slide 36 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 36 Gibraltar Florence Copper Category Short Tons (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Mo (%) Cu (billions lbs) Sulphide Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2024 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Proven 437 0.26 0.008 2.2 Probable 168 0.22 0.008 0.7 Ore Stockpiles 11 0.19 0.006 0.0 Total P&P Sulphide Reserves 616 0.25 0.008 3.0 Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2024 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Measured 767 0.25 0.008 3.9 Indicated 342 0.23 0.007 1.6 M&I Resources 1,109 0.24 0.007 5.4 Inferred 75 0.22 0.004 0.3 Category Short Tons (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Cu (billions lbs) Mineral Reserves Effective as of December 31, 2024 Proven 258 0.35 1.8 Probable 63 0.40 0.5 Total P&P Reserves 320 0.36 2.3 Mineral Reserves Effective as of December 31, 2024 Measured 292 0.34 2.0 Indicated 71 0.39 0.6 M&I Resources 363 0.35 2.5 Inferred 42 0.32 0.3 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, Vice President, Engineering for Taseko and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. The Gibraltar Mine mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2021 are documented in the Gibraltar Technical Report and have been depleted to reflect mining in 2022 through 2024. 3. Gibraltar Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 4. Sulphide Mineral Reserves are exclusive of Oxide Mineral Reserves and are contained within Mineral Resources. 5. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 6. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$3.05/lb Cu price, $12.00/lb Mo price, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 85% TCu and 40% Mo for sulphide ore and 50% ASCu for oxide ore. 7. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” pit using the following assumptions: Cu price of US$3.50/lb, Mo price of US$14.00/lb, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 85% for TCu and 40% for Mo. 8. A tonnage factor of 12ft3/ton has been applied for rock and 15ft3/ton for overburden and fill. 9. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, Vice President, Engineering for Taseko and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. The Florence Copper mineral reserves and resources effective December 31, 2022 are documented in the Florence Copper Technical Report and have been depleted to reflect copper extracted from the PTF due to rinsing operations in 2023 and 2024. 3. Florence Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 4. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 5. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 6. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using ISCR extraction methods using the following assumptions: $3.05 Cu price, $31,600/acre for core hole abandonment, $240,400/acre for cultural mitigations in identified Cultural Sites, $149,600 + $263/foot well drilling costs, $160/ton acid cost, $45.30/ton acid applied for well field operating costs, 1.2% surface losses, $0.10/lb Cu for electrowinning cost, $0.12/lb Cu G&A cost, $0.69/ton reclamation cost, $0.02/lb Cu shipping cost, 7% NSR royalties on ALSD land, 3% NSR royalties on freehold land, and 2.5% royalties on net profit. 7. Mineral Resources are confined to the Oxide and Transition ones inside a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” boundary assuming IS R extraction methods using the following assumptions: .5 u price, $31,600/acre for core hole abandonment, $240,400/acre for cultural mitigations in identified Cultural Sites, $149,600 + $263/foot well drilling costs, $160/ton acid cost, $45.30/ton acid applied for well field operating costs, 1.2% surface losses, $0.10/lb Cu for electrowinning cost, $0.12/lb Cu G&A cost, $0.69/ton reclamation cost, $0.02/lb Cu shipping cost, 7% NSR royalties on ALSD land, 3% NSR royalties on freehold land, and 2.5% royalties on net profit. 8. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported without a cut-off grade to reflect the nature of the ISCR extraction method proposed. 9. Tonnage factors of 13.5 ft3/ton and 13.13 ft3/ton have been applied corresponding to 8% porosity in the upper oxide zone and 5% porosity in the lower oxide and transition zones. 10. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Slide 37 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 37 Yellowhead Aley 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Jeremy Guichon, P. Eng., Director, Mine Engineering for Taseko and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Yellowhead Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 3. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 4. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 5. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on the following assumption: Metal prices of US$2.85/lb Cu, US$1,610/oz Au and US$18.75/oz Ag; a foreign exchange rate of C$1.30 : US$1.00; average metal recoveries of 90% for copper, 36% for gold and 59% for silver; combined processing, G&A and water treatment costs of C$7.40/t milled; pit-rim mining costs of C$2.33/t of overburden, C$2.28/t of non-PAG waste, C$2.79/t of PAG waste and C$2.07/t of ore with a bench increment of C$0.035/t mined per bench and sustaining capital allowance of C$0.20/t mined; average offsite costs of C$0.48/lb of copper; payable metal terms of 96.1% for copper, 90% for gold and 90% for silver; and overall pit slopes of 30 to 40 degrees. 6. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a Lerchs-Grossman pit optimi ation to meet “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” using the following assumptions: Metal prices of US .25/lb Cu, US$2,400/oz Au and US$28.00/oz Ag; a foreign exchange rate of C$1.30 : US$1.00; average metal recoveries of 89% for copper, 35% for gold and 59% for silver; combined processing and G&A costs of C$7.40/t milled; and pit-rim mining cost of C$2.31/t mined with a bench increment of C$0.035/t mined. 7. Bulk density is estimated by lithology and ranges between 2.71 t/m3 and 2.85 t/m3 in rock and 2.2 t/m3 in overburden. 8. Numbers may not add due to rounding. Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Cu (%) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Cu (billion lbs) Mineral Reserves Effective June 1, 2025 at a 0.17% Cu cut-off Proven 458 0.29 0.031 1.3 2.9 Probable 359 0.26 0.028 1.2 2.1 Total P&P Reserves 817 0.28 0.030 1.3 5.0 Mineral Resources Effective June 1, 2025 at a 0.15% Cu cut-off Measured 561 0.27 0.029 1.2 3.3 Indicated 735 0.24 0.027 1.2 3.8 Total M&I Resources 1,296 0.25 0.028 1.2 7.1 Inferred 111 0.24 0.026 1.2 0.6 Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Nb205 (%) Nb (million kg) Mineral Reserves Effective September 15, 2014 at a 0.30% Nb2O5 cut-off Proven 44 0.52 160 Probable 40 0.48 131 Total P&P Reserves 84 0.50 291 Mineral Resources Effective September 15, 2014 at a 0.20% Nb2O5 cut-off Measured 113 0.41 323 Indicated 173 0.35 424 Total M&I Resources 286 0.37 747 Inferred 144 0.32 323 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Scott Jones, P. Eng., former Vice President, Engineering for Taseko and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. Aley Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources follow CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014). 3. Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 4. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 5. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$45.00/kg Nb price, exchange rate of US$0.90=C$1.00, metallurgical recoveries of 65.4%, total operating costs of $55.79 per tonne milled. 6. The Mineral Resource has been confined by a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” pit using the following assumptions: US$50.00/kg Nb price, exchange rate of US$0.80=C$1.00, metallurgical recovery of 67% Nb, operating cost of $57.00 per tonne milled and pit slopes of 45 degrees. 7. Densities were modeled based on modeled lithologies and range from 2.88 t/m3 to 2.90 t/m3 except for overburden which uses a density of 2.0 t/m3. 8. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Slide 38 — Appendix – Reserves & Resources
Appendix – Reserves & Resources 38 New Prosperity 1. The resource and reserve estimation was completed under the supervision of Scott Jones, P. Eng., former Vice President, Engineering for Taseko and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. 2. New Prosperity Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 4. Mineral Reserves are assumed to be extracted using open pit mining methods and are based on US$1.25/lb Cu price, US$500/oz Au price, exchange rate of US$0.74=C$1.00, mining cost of C$1.20/t plus a bench increment of $0.03/t mined, Milling and G&A cost of $4.20/t milled and metallurgical recoveries of 90% Cu and 70% Au. 5. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 6. Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters. Category Tonnes (millions) Grade Contained Metal Au (g/t) Cu (%) Au (M oz) Cu (B lb) Mineral Reserves Effective November 2, 2009 at a C$5.50 NSR/t cut-off Proven 481 0.46 0.26 7.1 2.8 Probable 350 0.35 0.18 3.9 1.4 Total P&P Reserves 831 0.41 0.23 11.0 4.2 Mineral Resources Effective November 2, 2009 at 0.14% Cu cut-off Measured 547 0.46 0.27 8.1 3.3 Indicated 463 0.34 0.21 5.1 2.1 Total M&I Resources 1,010 0.41 0.24 13.3 5.3
Slide 39 — Appendix – NI 43-101 Compliance
Appendix – NI 43-101 Compliance 39 • Unless stated otherwise, Taseko Mines Limited (the “ ompany”) has prepared the technical information in this presentation including Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates (“Technical Information”) based on information contained in the technical reports, news releases and Annual Information Form (collectively the “ isclosure ocuments”) available under the ompany’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by or under the supervision of a qualified person (“Qualified Person”) as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”). For readers to fully understand the information in this presentation, they should read the technical reports identified below in their entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions, and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this presentation which qualifies the Technical Information. The Disclosure Documents and this presentation are each intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents. • Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates are shown on a 100 percent basis for each project. The Measured and Indicated Resource Estimates are inclusive of those Mineral Resources that have been converted to Mineral Reserves. All estimates are current as of their stated effective date in their corresponding technical reports with the exception of those for the Gibraltar Mine which reflect mining depletion since the effective date as documented in the ompany’s most recent Annual Information Form. Estimates for all projects are prepared by or under the supervision of a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101. Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates for all projects have been calculated using metal prices, foreign exchange, recoveries, and costs as stated in their respective technical reports. • For further Technical Information on the ompany’s properties, refer to the following technical reports, each of which is available on the ompany’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. • Gibraltar Mine: technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine, British Columbia, anada” issued March 30, 2022 with an effective date of March 15, 2022 prepared under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA. • Florence Copper Project: technical report entitled “NI 43‐101 Technical Report, Florence Copper Project, Pinal County, Ari ona” issued March 30, 2023 with an effective date of March 15, 2023 prepared under the supervision of Richard Tremblay, P.Eng., MBA, Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA, and Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng. • Yellowhead Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Yellowhead Copper Project, British Columbia, anada” issued January 16, 2020 with an effective date of January 16, 2020 prepared under the supervision of Richard Weymark, P. Eng., MBA. • Aley Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project, British Columbia, anada” issued October 30, 2014 with an effective date of September 15, 2014, as amended and restated December 4, 2017 prepared under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng., Keith Merriam, P.Eng., Greg Yelland, P.Eng., Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng., and Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo. • New Prosperity Project: technical report entitled “Technical Report on the 344 Million Tonne Increase in Mineral Reserves at the Prosperity Gold-Copper Project, British Columbia, anada” issued December 17, 2009 with an effective date of November 2, 2009 prepared under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng. Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report has not been updated since 2009 and accordingly, caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters.
Slide 40 — Investor Relations
40 Investor Relations Brian Bergot, Vice President, Investor Relations Office: 778.373.4554 Email: [email protected] TSX: TKO NYSE: TGB LSE: TKO Keep up with the latest news and project updates from Taseko facebook.com/TasekoMines x.com/tasekomines instagram.com/tasekomines linkedin.com/company/Taseko Scan to Subscribe
Slide 41 — Thank You!
Thank You! 41